United States v. Luongo’s Empirical Analysis
11 F.3d 7 · 1993
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2022
7 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 3013
Relies on Blum v. Stenson · Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States · Bullock v. United States · Bifulco v. United States · Gillette Co. v. Miner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`It is well established that each use of the wires constitutes a separate crime under 18 U.S.C. S 1343, even if the several uses are in pursuance of but one criminal enterprise.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.