Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 F.3d 732 - United States v. Thomas

United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

11 F.3d 732 · 1993

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably United States v. Canoy (1994), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (2005)

40 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

3501993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · GLK, Inc. v. United States · United States v. Headley · United States v. Poff · United States v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[U]nder the law of the case doctrine, 'when a court decides upon a rule of law, that decision should continue to govern the same issues in subsequent stages of the same case.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if an intervening change in the law, or some other special circumstance, warrants reexamining the claim.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] judge who misinterprets her authority has either committed a mistake of law under Sec. 3742(a)(1) or misapplied the guidelines under Sec. 3742(a)(2).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.