Gould v. Bowyer’s Empirical Analysis
11 F.3d 82 · 1993
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably Herzberger v. Standard Insurance (2000), NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc. v. Judicial Council of the California (2007)
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · Karcher v. May · Wetherell v. De Grandy · Colby v. Jc Penney Company Inc · Board of License Commissioners of Town of Tiverton v. H Pastore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] district court decision binds no judge in any other case, save to the extent that doctrines of preclusion (not stare decisis) apply.” Gould v. Bowyer, 11 F.3d 82 , 84 (7th Cir.1993); see also ATSI Commc’ns, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd., 547 F.3d 109 , 112 & n. 4 (2d Cir.2008) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]n order to spare busy courts unnecessary work, parties must advise a court when settlement is imminent.... The duty is implicit in the characterization of lawyers as officers of the court, and a breach of it therefore opens a lawyer to sanctions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“even if the reviewing court intoned in its most solemn voice that the district court's decision would have no precedential effect”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.