Hancock v. Albee’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2000
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1920
Relies on Harris v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. · W. F. & John Barnes Co. v. International Harvester Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reasonably necessary that plaintiffs' counsel should have a copy in order to protect the plaintiffs' rights by holding the impeachment within proper limits”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.