11 F. Supp. 2d 235 - Knapp v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Berry v. Schweiker · Marcus v. Califano · Mongeur v. Heckler · Johnson v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a finding that the Commissioner has failed to specify the basis for his conclusions is [a] compelling cause for remand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Calzada v. ASTURE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.