Prentice v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2016
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Richardson v. Perales · Brass v. American Film Technologies, Inc. · Gold v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Sheppard v. Beerman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.