11 F. Supp. 2d 889 - Cadena v. Tombone’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n · Rodriguez v. Bowen · Ojo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Venegas v. Henman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.