Friedin v. Fields

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1912

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1912-11-12

<p>Complaint; from city court of Vienna — Judge Lasseter. June 10, 1912.</p>

Relies on Hill v. Harris

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1912-11-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1962

3 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pottle, J.

¶1The evidence was conflicting and fully authorized the verdict in the plaintiff’s favor. . The charge contained some inaccuracies, but, as a whole, fairly stated the issues made by the pleadings and the evidence. Failure to give the correct rule for measuring the defendant’s damage under his plea of recoupment is not cause for a new trial, since the jury found wholly against the plea. Hill v. Harris, 11 Ga. App. 358 (75 S. E. 518). There was no error requiring a new trial.

¶2 Judgment affirmed.