¶1This was an indictment returned at the April term, 1852, for retailing spirituous liquors without license. Trial and conviction at the October term of that year. At the said October term, motions to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, and to quash the indictment, were severally overruled.
¶2The motion to dismiss was correctly overruled. Lichtenstein v. The State, 5 Ind. R. 162.
¶3The indictment did not state the quantity of liquor sold, nor for what price. The motion to quash should have been sustained. Segur v. The State, 6 Ind. R. 451.—Divine v. The State, 4 id. 240.
¶4The judgment is reversed, &c.