¶1It appears that the mortgage is forfeited, and there has been a foreclosure, and the mortgagee has taken possession. As the mortgagee is in possession, we think there in such a privity, that he ought to be allowed to come in and defend ; but we give no opinion whether a mortgagee ©til ©f peg» session may fee lei In to defend In ejectment
11 Johns. 407
Jackson ex dem. v. Stiles
Decided August 15, 1814
New York Supreme Court · decided 1814-08-15
<p>. A ®0;,W« ib possession may be leí id to defend, in an action ejectment</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1814-08-15
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1900
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →