Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

11 Jones & S. 38

Struppman v. Muller

The Superior Court of New York City · decided 1877-06-25

<p>APPEAL; WITHDRAWAL AND DISMISSAL OP.</p> <p>Where an appeal has been dismissed on the consent of the only appellant, no other party to the aetionhas a right to move the general term afterwards for an affirmance of the order or judgment appealed from. The party appellant or the parties appellants are the only parties who can move the court in favor of the appeal.</p>

Decided 1877-06-25

By the Court.—Freedman, J.

¶1—Upon proof that the appeals of the infant defendants Muller, from the orders of December 22, 1876, had been withdrawn pursuant to a stipulation entered into by the parties to said appeals, the general term, on February 23, 1877, granted an order dismissing said appeals without costs, and such order was duly entered.

¶2This having been done, another party to the action, who had no interest in said appeals, not having in fact appealed, has no right to procure, at a subsequent general term, an order of affirmance of the orders of December 22, 1876, by default. The party appellant or the parties appellants .are the only parties who can move the court in favor of the appeal.

¶3The order of March 5, 1877, should be vacated and set aside.

¶4Sedgwick and Speir, JJ., concurred.

/11/joness/38 · .json · Public domain