Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 KANAPP2D 161 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1987
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re the Attorney General, Stephan · Spencer v. Aetna Life & Casualty Insurance · Country Club Home, Inc. v. Harder · Leiker v. Manor House, Inc. · 3 Kan. App. 2d 29 - Hinton v. S. S. Kresge Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We need not reach consideration of what respondents here consider to be a troublesome application of the reservation concept. Assuming Welch’s testimony is sufficient to show knowledge, as we must on review, we nonetheless must disagree with the respondents’ legal conclusion that that knowledge must be imputed to KNI.” 11 Kan. App. 2d at 162-63 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.