11 Kan. App. 2d 228 - Ferrell v. Ferrell’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 10 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Baker v. Board of Regents (1993), Rockers v. Kansas Turnpike Authority (1999)
5 federal appellate · 10 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bowen v. Westerhaus · Farmers State Bank v. Cooper · Beams v. Werth · 3 Kan. App. 2d 596 - Coffey v. Stephens · Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Prior decisions confirm that an action to reform a deed on the ground of mutual mistake of the parties must be brought within the five-year period of the statute of limitations. (G.S.1949, 60-306, Sixth; Travis v. Glick, 150 Kan. 718 , 96 P.2d 624 ; and Regier v. Amerada Petroleum Corp., 139 Kan. 177 , 30 P.2d 136 .) There is no indication in any of the commentaries on K.S.A.1967 Supp. 60-511(5) that any change was intended regarding this section of the statute of limitations in the new code of civil procedure." (Emphasis added.) Beams v. Werth, 200 Kan. 532, 544 , 438 P.2d 957 (1968).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a defendant, who has acted in such a fashion that his conduct is sufficient to lull his adversary into a false sense of security forestalling the filing of suit until after the statute has run, will be precluded from relying on the bar of the statute.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he mere fact of remaining silent, when possessing material knowledge not held by another, is sufficient to toll the statute where that silence causes another to fail to take timely action which he would have taken had he possessed such knowledge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.