11 Kan. App. 2d 274 - Johnson v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2010
4 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hoard v. Shawnee Mission Medical Center · Vickers v. Wichita State University · Wentling v. Medical Anesthesia Services · State Ex Rel. Ludwick v. Bryant · Iseman v. Kansas Gas & Electric Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Plaintiffs argue thát the trial court erred in permitting a collateral attack on the earlier judgment. However, collateral estoppel only bars relitigation of an issue when the parties to the subsequent action are the same or in privity therein. Wells v. Davis, 226 Kan. 586, 589 , 603 P.2d 180 (1979). Defendant was not' a party to the prior case, nor was he in privity with either party in the' proceeding brought to enforce the divorce decree. Collateral estoppel wás- not applicable.” 11 Kan. App. 2d at 276 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Veatch v. Beck
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.