Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 Kan. App. 2d 4 - State v. Baker

11 Kan. App. 2d 4 - State v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 2004
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2004

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

80198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Miller v. California · Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia · Stanley v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the potential chilling effect the prosecution of projectionists may have on the showing of constitutionally protected films; (2) the fact that bookstore clerks may influence the customer’s choice as to a wide range of materials, while a projectionist must show whatever film has been selected by management; and (3) projectionists, by the nature of their work, have less of an opportunity to determine whether a film is obscene than does a bookstore clerk in determining whether a magazine is obscene.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Before a statute may be stricken down, it must clearly appear the statute violates the Constitution. Moreover, it is the court's duty to uphold the statute under attack, if possible, rather than defeat it, and, if there is any reasonable way to construe the statute as constitutionally valid, that should be done.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When the constitutionality of a statute is challenged, the statute comes before the court cloaked in a presumption of constitutionality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.