Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 Kan. App. 2d 655 - State v. Brewer

11 Kan. App. 2d 655 - State v. Brewer’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2024

22 state decisions

14019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 6002

Relies on Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Kastigar v. United States · In Re the Attorney General, Stephan · United States v. Alter · Kastigar v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) When the same conduct of a defendant may establish the commission of more than one crime under the laws of this state, the defendant may be prosecuted for each of such crimes. Each of such crimes may be alleged as a separate count in a single complaint, information or indictment. “(2) Upon prosecution for a crime, the defendant may be convicted of either the crime charged or an included crime, but not both. An included crime may be any of the following: (a) A lesser degree of the same crime; (b) an attempt to commit the crime charged; (c) an attempt to commit a lesser degree of the crime charged; or (d) a crime necessarily proved if the crime charged were proved.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the immunity must insulate the witnesses as to all prior criminal conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.