Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

11 Mass. 234

Herrick v. Richardson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1814-05-15

This was a writ of scire facias against the defendant as bail of one David Herrin.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1881

Cited in Bouvier (1914)’s definition of “Recognizance”

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1814-05-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The return of the officer is not non est inventus; nor sufficient to charge the bail. Let the plaintiff be called, (a)

¶2Plaintiff nonsuit.

¶3*219CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT, IN THE COUNTY OF LINCOLN, JUNE TERM, 1814, AT WISCASSET. PRESENT: Hon. SAMUEL SEW ALL, Chief Justice. Hon. GEORGE THATCHER,) Hon. ISAAC PARKER, > Justices Hon. DANIEL DEWEY, )

¶4 Vide Sayward & Al. vs. Conant, ante, 146, and note.

/11/mass/234 · .json · Public domain