Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

11 Mass. 74

Jones v. Whitney

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1814-03-15

Assumpsit upon a promissory note, dated November 3, 1803. for 100 dollars, made by one Cyrus Whitney, payable to the de fendant, and by him endorsed to the plaintiff..

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1814-03-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1934

4 state decisions

101814182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1In this case the two notes form together one usurious contract. The statute avoids them both.

¶2Judgment on the verdict. (2), (a)

¶3 Vide Cro. Jac. 508, Roberts vs. Trenayne.

¶4 Maine Bank vs. Butts, 9 Mass. Rep. 49. — Bridge & Al. vs. Hubbard, 15 Mass Rep. 96.— Wickes vs. Gogerly, 2 Car. & P. 397, 1 R. & M. 123. —Preston vs. Jackson 2 Stark. 237.—Pickering vs. Banks, Forrest, 72.

/11/mass/74 · .json · Public domain