Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 McCanless 219 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
April 1984
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 1984

14 state decisions

100196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Davis · Cordell v. State · Link v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This assignment must be overruled for at least one reason and that is a motion to quash will not lie, unless the indictment is defective on its face. State v. Davis, 204 Tenn. 553 , 322 S.W.2d 232 .””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.