11 Md. App. 18 - Morris v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 5 Md. App. 450 - Williams v. State · Hazel v. State · 4 Md. App. 689 - Strawderman v. State · 5 Md. App. 675 - Greathouse v. State · 5 Md. App. 180 - Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[H]e opposed, in a writing duly filed, ‘any action by the court in entering a judgment of not guilty by reason of insanity until such time as it should appear, beyond a reasonable doubt that there was, in fact, a crime committed.’ He asserted, ‘the plea as suggested by the State, presupposes guilt on the Defendant and such is properly not the case.’ He stated that he was, ‘in fact, not guilty of the offenses charged and until such time as the State should prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he is guilty of the charge of the offense of rape, the State could not, nor could the Defendant, properly seek to enter a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity without a trial.’ He pointed out, ‘While it is apparent that the Defendant was mentally ill, at the time in question, nowhere does it appear that this claim of rape took place and the evidence may indicate to the contrary.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““When it is desired to interpose the defense of insanity on behalf of one charged with the commission of a crime the defendant or his-, counsel shall at the time of pleading to the * * * indictment * * * file a plea in writing in addition to the plea or pleas otherwise required or permitted by law, alleging that the defendant was insane at the time of the commission of the alleged offense. * * *” (emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“be a danger to himself or the safety of the person or property of others,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dorsey v. Solomon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.