Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 MINN 410 - Robinson v. Bartlett

Robinson v. Bartlett’s Empirical Analysis

1866

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
March 1916
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Peckham v. M. D. Gilman & Co. · McComb, Simpson & Co. v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The question as to the relation of a party signing his name upon the hack of a promissory note, under these circumstances, has been repeatedly before this court for consideration. It has in every instance been determined that his relation and rights and obligations are those of a maker, and that he is not entitled to demand and notice as an indorser. * * * This is in harmony with the weight of authority in England and our own country.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.