Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

11 N.C. 200

State v. . Antonio

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1825

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1825-12-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1986

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1825-12-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The prisoner moved, before judgment, to set aside the verdict, and have a new venire because of the denial of his prayer for a jury de medietate, which being refused, and judgment pronounced, the prisoner appealed. Judge Williams informed me that he allowed it at a court of oyer and terminer held at Wilmington many years ago for the trial of some prisoners who were aliens and natives of France. *89

¶2GASTON: It seems, then, to have been considered the law; the Legislature has not since altered it.

¶3Attorney-General for the State. (204)

¶4The Court differed in opinion, HALL and HENDERSON holding that the prisoner was not entitled to a jury de medietate, and the Chief Justice that he was, and they delivered their respective opinions seriatim, as follows:

/11/nc/200 · .json · Public domain