11 Nev. 428
Decided October 15, 1876
Nevada Supreme Court · decided 1876-10-15
<p>When Judgment will be Aeitbmed.—Where there is no motion for a new trial, or bill of exceptions, and where no error is suggested by counsel for appellant, the judgment will be affirmed.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1876-10-15
Cited by 28 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2021 · most notably Crist v. Bretz (1978), Ex Parte Lewis (2007)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1By tbe Court,
¶2Tbe defendant in this case appeals from a judgment convicting bim of an assault with intent to inflict bodily injury. There was no motion for a new trial, and there is no bill of exceptions. Tire record discloses no error on the part of the district court, and none is suggested by counsel for appellant.
¶3Tbe judgment is affirmed.