Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 NY2D 142 - People v. Coffey

People v. Coffey’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
6
states following
August 1995
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently August 1995 · most notably 81 Ill. 2d 571 - People v. Rogers (1980), State v. DelVecchio (1962)

8 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

3601962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · People v. Singer · People v. Spinello · People v. Winship · People v. Durling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “contrived after defendant was arrested. To meet this claim the prosecution exercised its right to show by independent evidence that long before this alleged fabrication the witness Nilsson had taken a consistent position. This the prosecution did by proving that before he picked out defendant in a police line-up Nilsson had so described the thief to the police expert that the latter was able to make a sketch or drawing which closely resembled the actual appearance of defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a sketch drawn by the police artist from details given by [the victim],”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “under the well-established exception to the hearsay rule that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.