People v. MacShane’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Defendant] failed to meet his burden of establishing a prima facie case of discrimination under step one of the three-step protocol in [ Batson ].... He did not articulate facts and circumstances that raised an inference that the prosecutor excused these jurors for a discriminatory reason; instead, defense counsel merely identified a general motive to discriminate untethered to the particular jurors at issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Rhone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.