Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 Ohio App. 2d 1 - Henderson v. State

11 Ohio App. 2d 1 - Henderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
October 1979
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Douglas v. People of State of California · State v. Perry · Wisconsin v. Illinois · Dyer v. Murray · Cameron v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The first paragraph of the syllabus of State v. Catlino, 10 Ohio St. 2d 183 , is as follows: “ ‘A convicted defendant has a constitutional right to counsel on a direct appeal to the Court of Appeals from his judgment of conviction. (Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353 , followed.) ’ “However, the weight of authority is that the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution does not extend to appeals from a denial of relief in postconviction proceedings for the vacation of sentences which have become final and are no longer subject to appeal. State v. Buffington, 7 Ohio App. 2d 211 ; French v. Green, Supt. (D. C. Ohio), 264 F. Supp. 922 ; United States, ex rel. Boone, v. Fay (D. C. N. Y.), 231 F. Supp. 387 , certiorari denied, 380 U. S. 936 , 85 S. Ct. 945 , 13 L. Ed. 2d 823 ; United States, ex rel. Combs, v. Denno (D. C. N. Y.), 231 F. Supp. 942 ; Young v. United States (C. C. A. 5), 246 F. 2d 901 , certiorari denied, 355 U. S. 917 , 78 S. Ct. 348 , 2 L. Ed. 2d 277 ; Waldon v. District Court of Lee County, 256 Iowa 1311 , 130 N. W. 2d 728 ; Ingram v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 221 Md. 597 , 155 A. 2d 668 , certiorari denied, 361 U. S. 971 , 80 S. Ct. 604 , 4 L. Ed. 2d 551 ; Duffin v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 224 Md. 645 , 167 A. 2d 601 ; 24A Corpus Juris Secundum 50, Criminal Law, Section 1710 (7).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.