Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 Ohio App. 2d 160 - Markese v. Ellis

11 Ohio App. 2d 160 - Markese v. Ellis’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2011

3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

50196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]ne cannot justly or equitably lull his adversary into a false sense of security, and thereby cause the adversary to subject a claim to the bar of the statute of limitations, and then be permitted to plead the very delay caused by his course of conduct as a defense to the action when brought.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““There is no evidence that .the defendants misrepresented their position, or that they mislead the plaintiff in any way; there is nothing that indicates in the negotiations for settlement that the agents for the insurance company endeavored to delay a settlement to the end that the plaintiff would abstain from employing legal counsel, or from commencing a suit within the statutory period; there is nothing to show that the plaintiff relied on statements of the defendant Hartford, which influenced her failure to bring suit within the statutory time.” Id., 11 Ohio App.2d at 163 , 40 O.O.2d at 315 , 229 N.E.2d at 73 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to prevent results contrary to good conscience and fair dealing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.