11 Ohio App. 3d 202 - Bloom v. Dieckmann’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2 district · 73 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably 140 Ohio App. 3d 1 - Baiko v. Mays (2000), 105 Ohio App. 3d 373 - Georgeoff v. O'Brien (1995)
2 district · 73 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 75 Ill. App. 3d 516 - Schmidt v. Hinshaw, Culbertson, Moelmann, Hoban and Fuller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so obvious that it may be determined by the court as a matter of law.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brust v. Kravitz · Yates v. Brown“Summary judgment in favor of the attorney is appropriate when a plaintiff fails to supply expert testimony on alleged negligence that is 'neither within the ordinary knowledge of the layman nor so clear as to constitute negligence as a matter of law.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.