11 Ohio App. 3d 263 - Stemen v. Shibley’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
53 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably 13 Ohio App. 3d 7 - Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co. (1983), 43 Ohio App. 3d 95 - Adkins v. Adkins (1988)
53 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co. · In re Disbarment of Gately · Hounshell v. American States Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The doctrine of the law of the case does not foreclose a party from filing, nor the court from considering, a new motion for summary judgment, notwithstanding that the trial court, in the same case, had previously granted summary judgment, which judgment was subsequently reversed on appeal, where such new motion is based upon an expanded record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““* * * When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleadings, but his response * * * must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`[E]ven if the non-moving party does not submit evidence opposing that which the moving party has submitted, Civ.R. 56(E) states that the court shall grant summary judgment only”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.