Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 Ohio App. 3d 84 - State v. Sandlin

11 Ohio App. 3d 84 - State v. Sandlin’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2019

18 state decisions

901983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shillitani v. United States · Cree v. Goldstein · State v. Edwards · Jordan v. Arizona · Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Criminal contempts are comprised of those offenses against the dignity or process of the court, whereas civil contempts are those violations which are on the surface offenses against the party for whose benefit the order was made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.