Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 Or. App. 1 - Clackamas County v. Holmes

11 Or. App. 1 - Clackamas County v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1973
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * There is an exception to the `actual use' requirement [for a nonconforming use] in situations where a property owner has incurred substantial and legally sufficient expense in reliance upon a previously issued building permit * * *." Clackamas County v. Holmes, 11 Or. App. at ___ , 501 P.2d at 337 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.