11 Or. App. 592 - State v. Sallinger’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2020
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Warkentin v. Kleinwachter · Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Commission · State Ex Rel. Barnett v. Timken · 166 Pa. Super. 520 - Dyer v. Dyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) A person commits the crime of harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person, he:”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“* * * by `offensive physical contact' the legislature meant striking, slapping, shoving, kicking, grabbing, and similar acts that are an interference with the `contactee' * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"He strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise subjects [another] to physical contact * * *."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.