Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 P.3d 222 - Hull v. Hull

Hull v. Hull’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Abel v. Tisdale · Mueggenborg v. Walling · Manhart v. Manhart · Broadwater v. Courtney · Dominion Bank of Middle Tennessee v. Masterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “pursuant to 12 O.S. § 651 ¶16 Mother appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶17 "Motions for New Trial are directed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the court's ruling thereon will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of an abuse of that discretion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A trial court is vested with broad legal discretion in granting or denying a new trial, and unless it clearly appears that the trial court erred in some pure, simple question of law, or acted arbitrarily, its judgment will not be disturbed on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.