Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 PAD&C2D 601 - Commonwealth v. McDermott

Commonwealth v. McDermott’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2020

2 state decisions

1019561960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Petrillo · Phillips v. Municipal Court · State of Arizona v. Starr · Commonwealth v. Keenan & Clark · Commonwealth v. Bovaird

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In plain words, any person of ordinary understanding can readily know that if he moves around a place which somebody else uses for living purposes, at nighttime, in a stealthy or sneaky manner with an evil intention, he will run afoul of the law and be subject to punishment. This is a clearly defined standard which the ordinary person can understand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.