Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 SD 348 - Turner v. Hand County

Turner v. Hand County’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
5
states following
April 1953
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 1953

11 state decisions

501898190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tidd v. Rines · Lawrence v. Fast · Woods v. Freeman · Evans v. Fall River County · Van Cise v. Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The combination ‘s2se&s2sw sec. or lot 30 twp. or blk. 113 rng. 69’ is an idealess jumble of letters and figures, confusing in the extreme, and intolerable when employed as a means by which to divest title to real estate without the consent of the owner.” Turner v. Hwnd County, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.