11 So. 3d 1197 - Hebert v. Shelton’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 509 So. 2d 420 - Jordan v. Employee Transfer Corp. · 540 So. 2d 304 - Whitnell v. Menville · 620 So. 2d 1154 - Cole v. Celotex Corp. · Lake Providence Equipment Co. v. Tallulah Production Credit Ass'n · 801 So. 2d 331 - VaSalle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to question whether the law extends a remedy to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition. The peremptory exception of no cause of action is designed to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether [the] plaintiff is afforded a remedy in law based on the facts alleged in the pleading. No evidence may be introduced to support or controvert the objection that the petition fails to state a cause of action. The exception is triable on the face of the papers and for the purposes of determining the issues raised by the exception, the well-pleaded facts in the petition must be accepted as true.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“standard of review for sustaining or denying a peremptory exception of no cause of action is de novo because it raises a question of law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.