11 So. 3d 428 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2025
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 397 So. 2d 1120 - Tibbs v. State · 787 So. 2d 747 - Stephens v. State · 594 So. 2d 292 - Fenelon v. State · Lester v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'an instruction is confusing or misleading, prejudicial error occurs where the jury might reasonably have been misled and the instruction caused them to arrive at a conclusion that it otherwise would not have reached.’ ” (quoting Tinker v. State, 784 So.2d 1198, 1200 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001))). .The state moved a certified copy of Mr. Cram's driving record into evidence, which showed that his”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crain v. State“If the testimony of the female is not supported by other evidence her testimony should be rigidly examined, especially as it related to the nature and extent of the force used and as it related to the question of whether or not consent was ever finally given.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Gutierrez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.