Perez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the same type of moral corruption and dishonesty” inherent in bribery, perjury, or forgery. However, the difference could affect future removal cases, so the Court should pay future litigants the courtesy of discussing our sister high court’s precedent and either distinguish Perez or adopt its less-sweeping interpretation of”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Moore v. State · In Re Bazan

2. “(a) A challenge for cause is an objection made to a particular juror, alleging some fact, which renders him incapable or unfit to serve on the jury. A challenge for cause may be made by either the state or the defense for any of the following reasons: [[Image here]] 2. That he has been convicted of theft or any felony; 3. That he is under indictment or other legal accusation for theft or any felony; 4. That he is insane....”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Perez v. State

3. “(1) the defendant raises the disqualification before the verdict is entered; or (2) the disqualification was not discovered or brought to the attention of the trial court until after the verdict was entered and the defendant makes a showing of significant harm by the service of the disqualified juror.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Perez v. State