Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

11 S.W.3d 279

Eubanks v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1999

Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1999-10-28

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2014

2 state decisions

Relies on Sharkey v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-10-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BEN Z. GRANT, Justice,

¶1concurring.

¶2No language in the act says that a judge who has not heard all or a part of a case may render judgment on the case. For the reasons set forth in Sharkey v. Texas, 994 S.W.2d 417 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1999, no pet.), I disagree on affirming this judgment without it being signed by the judge who actually tried the case or heard a portion thereof.

¶3I respectfully concur.

/11/sw3d/279 · .json · Public domain