Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 U.S. 156 - Marsteller v. McClean

Marsteller v. McClean’s Empirical Analysis

11 U.S. 156 · 1812

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
February 1908
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1908

3 state decisions

301812182018301840185018601870188018901900decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Welch v. Mandeville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When once the statute runs against one of two parties entitled to a joint action, it operates as a bar to such joint action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.