Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 U.S. 34 - Alexander Shirras John Black William Milligan William Blacklock Joseph Verrees v. John Caig Robert Mitchel

Alexander Shirras John Black William Milligan William Blacklock Joseph Verrees v. John Caig Robert Mitchel’s Empirical Analysis

11 U.S. 34 · 1812

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 10 district · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1992 · most notably Davis v. Schwartz (1895), Jones v. Guaranty and Indemnity Company (1879)

8 federal appellate · 10 district · 28 state decisions — followed in 13 states

1501812182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on De Butts v. Bacon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not to be denied that a deed which misrepresents a transaction it recites, and the consideration on which it is executed, is liable to suspicion. It must sustain a rigorous examination. It is, certainly, always advisable fairly and plainly to state the truth. But if, upon investigation, the real transaction shall appear to be fair, though somewhat variant from that which is described, it would seem to be unjust and unprecedented to deprive the person claiming under the deed of his real equitable rights, unless it be in favor of a person who has been in fact injured and deceived by the misrepresentation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.