Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 U.S. 69 - Russell v. Clark's Executors

Russell v. Clark's Executors’s Empirical Analysis

11 U.S. 69 · 1812

Citation profile

142
cited by 142 later decisions
19
cited 19 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 7 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 142 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2016 · most notably Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board (1938), William Shields v. Robert R Barrow (1854)

40 federal appellate · 7 district · 26 state decisions — followed in 15 states

220181218201830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on De Butts v. Bacon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 142 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do ourselves the pleasure of introducing them to your correspondence, as a house on whose integrity and punctuality, the utmost dependence may be placed; they will write you the nature of their intentions, and you may be assured of their complying fully with any contract or engagements they may enter into with you,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““If a claim is to be satisfied out of a fund which is accessible only by the aid of a court of chancery, application may be made in the first instance to that court, which will not require that the claim should be first established in a court of law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““It is the duty of the individual who contracts with one man on the credit of another not to trust to ambiguous phrases and strained constructions, but to require an explicit and plain declaration of the obligation he is about to assume. ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.