Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

11 U.S.C. § 1128

Section 1128 · Confirmation hearing

Amended 1 time on record

Applied in 105 court decisions — leading case Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd. (1990)

Most recently applied in Hsin Chi Su & F3 Capital v. Offshore Grp. Inv. Ltd. (In re Vantage Drilling Int'l) (June 2019)

Cases citing this section usually also cite 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 1123 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

How often courts cite this section

19781980199020002010201960cited by95-598enacted · 1978 · 95-598Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd.leading · 1990 · Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd.
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year.Markers show enactment, consequential amendments, and circuit splits over this section — watch for a citation surge after a change or a disagreement. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(a) After notice, the court shall hold a hearing on confirmation of a plan.

(b) A party in interest may object to confirmation of a plan.

Editorial notes U.S. Code · Office of the Law Revision Counsel

Historical and Revision Notes

[Section 1129 (enacted as section 1128)] Subsection (a) requires that there be a hearing in every case on the confirmation of the plan. Notice is required.

Subsection (b) permits any party in interest to object to the confirmation of the plan. The Securities and Exchange Commission and indenture trustees, as parties in interest under section 1109, may object to confirmation of the plan.

/11/usc/1128 · .json · Public domain