11 Wash. App. 323 - State v. Hodge’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1990
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 48 Wash. 2d 545 - In RE OLSEN v. Delmore · 83 Wash. 2d 594 - State v. Taylor · 63 Wash. 2d 94 - Ledgering v. State · 2 Wash. 2d 118 - State v. Smith · 56 Wash. 2d 700 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c) Other Proof. This rule does not prevent the proof of official records or of entry or lack of entry therein by any other method authorized by law. CR 44(c). The court in Hodge stated at page 328 that RCW 5.44.040 4 was not superseded by CR 44 and found no error in the admission of documents certified as follows: I, Lucy S. Segal, do hereby certify that I am the duly appointed and acting Supervisor of the Motor Vehicles Records Section of the Department of Motor Vehicles for the State of Washington. I am the custodian of the motor vehicle records kept in the Department of Motor Vehicles for the State of Washington. I further certify that the attached are photo enlargments [sic] of the microfilm records as follows: [Then follows explanation of what three attached documents are.] I further certify that the records from which the enclosed copies were made are on file as public documents in the Department of Motor Vehicles, at Olympia, Washington.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.