11 Wis. 2d 492 - Truesdill v. Roach’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2011
1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. · Pierce v. Conners · Reber v. Hanson · Town of Blooming Grove v. City of Madison · Hansberry v. Dunn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“person to whom the amount recovered belongs”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Parties united in interest to be joined; ... Of the parties to the action those who are united in interest must be joined as plaintiffs or defendants; but if the consent of any one who should be joined as plaintiff cannot be obtained he may be made a defendant, the reason thereof being stated in the complaint; and when the question . . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It does not logically follow that because the recovery by one of a class of beneficiaries designated in the wrongful death statute is diminished or defeated, that each member of the class has a separate and distinct cause of action or their interests are not united.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.