Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

110 A.D. 866

Park v. Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1905-12-15

<p>Appeal from an order.denying'a motion for leave to renew an application to,interpose,a supplemental answer.</p>

Decided 1905-12-15

Per Curiam:

¶1Considering the nature of the action, we think that the defendant should be allowed to serve a supplemental an'swer. The fact that She did not make, the affidavit is explained by her absence in Europe, sick. The order appealed from should be reversed and the motion granted. Present — O’Brien, P. J., Patterson (dissenting), Ingraham, Laughlin and Clarke, JJ. Order reversed and motion

/110/ad/866 · .json · Public domain