¶1Considering the nature of the action, we think that the defendant should be allowed to serve a supplemental an'swer. The fact that She did not make, the affidavit is explained by her absence in Europe, sick. The order appealed from should be reversed and the motion granted. Present — O’Brien, P. J., Patterson (dissenting), Ingraham, Laughlin and Clarke, JJ. Order reversed and motion
110 A.D. 866
Park v. Park
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 1905
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1905-12-15
<p>Appeal from an order.denying'a motion for leave to renew an application to,interpose,a supplemental answer.</p>
Decided 1905-12-15