¶1Petitioner’s conviction for petit larceny and his false answer to question 18 on his renewal application supported the determination to revoke petitioner’s license (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). We find no merit to petitioner’s various other contentions. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
110 A.D.2d 772
Titus v. Shaffer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 1985
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1985-04-15
Decided 1985-04-15