Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

110 A.D.2d 860

People v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1985-04-22

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-04-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2011

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

201985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Even if it was error for the court not to have charged the jury on criminal trespass in the third degree as a lesser included offense of burglary in the second degree or burglary in the third degree, as requested by counsel, the error was harmless under the circumstances, since the jury was instructed as to criminal trespass in the second degree and rejected that lesser included offense (see, People v Richette, 33 NY2d 42).

¶2We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Brown, JJ., concur.

/110/ad2d/860 · .json · Public domain