Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 Ariz. 396 - State v. Delvecchio

State v. Delvecchio’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Badger v. Cardwell (1978), Kpnx Broadcasting v. Superior Court, Etc. (1984)

31 state decisions

120197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Allen · Union Transfer Co. v. United States · State v. Bustamante · State v. Loftis · State v. Van Bogart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial judge has not only the right but the responsibility of seeing that trials are conducted properly and without disruption, and he is allowed to take those necessary measures to provide for the orderly disposition of criminal cases.... A criminal trial is coercive in nature and a defendant will seldom voluntarily submit to such a trial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If a defendant, while exercising his right to represent himself, is able to disrupt a criminal trial to the point that a trial cannot be had, conceivably he could never be convicted of the crime of which he might be guilty. In the instant case the defendant, by his own actions, lost the right to continue the conduct of his own trial. A defendant may not assert his right to represent himself and then by his conduct make it impossible for that right to be exercised. We find no error.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.