Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 ARK 99 - Cunningham v. Keeshan

Cunningham v. Keeshan’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 1983
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 1983

8 state decisions

3019131920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Butler v. Board of Directors of Fourche Drainage District · State ex rel. Attorney General v. Trulock · Altheimer v. Board of Directors of Plum Bayou Levee District · Cypress Creek Drainage District v. Wolfe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There are certain elemental rules of construction to be observed in the interpretation of statutes from which we will not depart. One is that, where a law is plain and unambiguous, there is no room left for construction, and neither the exigencies of a case nor a resort to extrinsic facts will be permitted to alter the meaning of the language used in the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.